Intoxication and Criminal Liability
Latest news
We intend to publish a report later in 2008.
Background
Many crimes, particularly crimes of violence, are committed when the offender is in a state of extreme or partial intoxication, usually as a result of the voluntary consumption of alcohol but often because of his or her use of (other) drugs, or a combination of alcohol and drugs. This view is supported by a number of empirical studies.
It would appear, moreover, that the media are reporting an increase in the number of alcohol-related crimes of violence, with recent articles including references to drunken street violence being out of control and binge-drinking leading to violent "no-go" areas in many town centres.
It follows that the availability (or non-availability) of defences to criminal liability based on intoxication may have a far-reaching effect across a wide spectrum of criminal behaviour and on the perception – particularly the perception of a victim and his or her family – of whether justice has been done. The availability (or non-availability) of intoxication-based defences to crimes is therefore an extremely important social and political, as well as legal, issue.
The Law Commission undertook a thorough review of the law on intoxication prior to publishing its 1992 consultation paper Intoxication and Criminal Liability (LCCP 127). Following consultation, the Commission's final recommendations were set out in its 1995 report Legislating the Criminal Code: Intoxication and Criminal Liability (LC 229).
However, the Commission's Draft Criminal Law (Intoxication) Bill appended to the 1995 report has never been presented to Parliament. In its 1998 consultation paper - Violence, Reforming the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - the Home Office commented that the Government had considered the Commission's recommendations and draft Criminal Law (Intoxication) Bill but had concluded "that they were unnecessarily complex for the purposes of [its Offences against the Person] Bill".
More than a decade after the publication of the 1995 report we are of the view that codification with clarification and modifications is still the right approach; but we accept that the Commission's previous attempt to give effect to this policy might legitimately be regarded as unduly complex.
We have therefore decided to revisit this extremely important aspect of the criminal law with a view to providing the Government with an entirely new draft Bill which, while consistent with the policy underpinning the 1995 Bill, seeks to address the criticisms levelled against our previous attempt to codify the law.
For more information, contact the criminal law team or go to the team page.
NOTE - We are happy to provide information about our projects. However, we cannot give legal advice or deal with individual cases. Nor do we help with student assignments.