Consumer Remedies for Faulty Goods
Latest news
On 4 November 2009, the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission published a final report with recommendations on simplifying the law on consumer remedies for faulty goods. An outline, press release, and impact assessment are also available.
Currently, UK consumers have a legal "right to reject" faulty goods. This means a right to a refund if they act within “a reasonable time”. By contrast, under the European Consumer Sales Directive, consumers’ first recourse is to repair or replacement. Further, in October 2008, the European Commission published a proposal for a new directive on consumer rights which, if adopted as published, would mean that the UK would have to abolish the right to reject.
In our report, we recommend that the right to reject should be retained in the UK as a short-term remedy of first instance. It is a simple, easy to use remedy which inspires consumer confidence. We recommend that in normal circumstances, a consumer should have 30 days to return faulty goods and receive a refund, with limited flexibility for special circumstances such as perishable goods, or goods which both parties know will not be used for some time.
Consultation
Our report follows a joint consultation paper published in November 2008. Appendix C (the European Consumer Centre Questionnaire) and Appendix D (the Comparative Section) to the consultation paper are also available. In 13 May 2009, we published a summary of the 53 responses we received to the consultation.
The responses we received showed that there was strong support for keeping the right to reject amongst consumers and business groups alike. Consultees told us that the only problem with the right to reject is uncertainty over how long it lasts. Therefore, the majority also agreed with our proposal that there should be a normal period of 30 days in which to exercise the right to reject, with a limited amount of flexibility to extend or reduce this period.
We commissioned market research among consumers which showed that 94% of consumers felt that the right to a refund for faulty goods was important to them, and 89% thought it should be retained even though other remedies (repair and replacement) are available. The research also provides support for a 30-day normal period in which to exercise the right to reject. When consumers were asked to say how long the right to reject should last, the most common reply was that it should last for about a month.
Background
The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (now the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills - BIS) referred this issue to us in December 2007, on the recommendation of the Davidson Review. The Davidson Review was set up by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in 2005, and recommended that the DTI should ask the English and Scottish Law Commissions to produce a joint report on the reform and simplification of remedies available to consumers relating to the sale or supply of goods.
NOTE - We are happy to provide information about our projects. However, we cannot give legal advice or deal with individual cases. Nor do we provide legal research to assist with student assignments. This does not affect your rights under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to request information.