Law CommissionLaw Commission montage
HomeAbout > Commercial and Common Law


Forfeiture and the Law of Succession

Background

There is rule that a murderer may not inherit from the person they have killed. This rule is well-established and we are not suggesting any changes to it. The issue is that the law also cuts out the murderer's descendants from the line of succession. This project looks to see whether it is right to bar the descendants of killers in this way.

The project arose out of a case decided by the Court of Appeal in 2000.  A son murdered both his parents (who died intestate).  The son forfeited his rights to the estate. The Court found that the son's son (the deceaseds' grandson) was also disinherited.

Final Report

On 27 July 2005 we published a final Report (Law Com No 295).

We recommend that in any instance where a potential heir cannot inherit, or is disqualified from inheriting, property should be distributed as if that person had died.  This means that:

The report also recommends removing a small anomaly in intestacy law. Where a potential heir dies unmarried under the age of 18 but leaves children behind, the inheritance should go to their children.

Our Consultation Paper was published October 2003 (CP No 172). A summary of the consultation proposals is also available. Most of the 30 responses we received welcomed the thrust of our proposals.

For more information, contact the commercial and common law team or go to the team page.

NOTE - We are happy to provide information about our projects. However, we cannot give legal advice or deal with individual cases. Nor do we help with student assignments.

Back to top