Current project status
The current status of this project is: Complete.
List of project stages:
- Analysis of responses
- Initiation: Could include discussing scope and terms of reference with lead Government Department
- Pre-consultation: Could include approaching interest groups and specialists, producing scoping and issues papers, finalising terms of project
- Consultation: Likely to include consultation events and paper, making provisional proposals for comment
- Policy development: Will include analysis of consultation responses. Could include further issues papers and consultation on draft Bill
- Reported: Usually recommendations for law reform but can be advice to government, scoping report or other recommendations
Protecting consumers who prepay for items. We await the Government’s response.
Prepayments are popular because they can be used to budget for big spends, such as Christmas, or as a deposit for major purchases like cars or new kitchens. On a smaller scale, gift vouchers and cards solve the dilemma of choosing the “right” gift.
However, if the business that has taken the prepayment goes bust, consumers may be left with neither the item they paid for, nor any real prospect of a refund.
The collapse of the Farepak Christmas savings club in 2006 left many vulnerable consumers out of pocket. More recent high-profile retailer insolvencies have further highlighted the lack of protection for consumers making these kinds of payments.
Consumers, who are classed as unsecured creditors, are very near the bottom of the list for repayment and frequently receive nothing. Consumers are also often unaware of the legal situation, and in some cases, conflicting information from administrators further confuses the situation.
This project, which was commissioned by the then Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), considered whether greater protection is needed for consumers who lose deposits or gift vouchers when retailers or other service providers become insolvent.
After receiving the referral from BIS, we gathered empirical evidence about the scale of the problem and the current law. In summer 2015, we set out our findings and consulted on possible solutions. We received 41 responses to our consultation, a summary of which is available below.
We analysed the consultation responses and developed final recommendations, set out in our July 2016 report. The report, and a shorter summary of it, are available below.
The report sets out five recommendations which would improve consumers’ position on insolvency:
- Regulating Christmas and similar savings schemes, which pose a particular risk to vulnerable consumers.
- Introducing a general power for Government to require prepayment protection in sectors which pose a particular risk to consumers.
- Giving consumers more information about obtaining a refund through their debit or credit card issuer.
- Making a limited change to the insolvency hierarchy, to give a preference to the most vulnerable category of prepaying consumers.
- Making changes to the rules on when consumers acquire ownership of goods.
We laid our report before Parliament on 13 July 2016 and await the Government’s response. Our recommendations to ensure that consumers receive better information in the event of insolvency are already being taken forward by the Insolvency Service.
The team involved in the preparation of the report included Tamara Goriely (team manager), Laura Burgoyne (team lawyer), Conor McLaughlin (research assistant 2014-15) and Paul Smylie (research assistant 2015-16).
Area of law
Commercial and common law