Current project status
The current status of this project is: Complete.
List of project stages:
- Analysis of responses
- Initiation: Could include discussing scope and terms of reference with lead Government Department
- Pre-consultation: Could include approaching interest groups and specialists, producing scoping and issues papers, finalising terms of project
- Consultation: Likely to include consultation events and paper, making provisional proposals for comment
- Policy development: Will include analysis of consultation responses. Could include further issues papers and consultation on draft Bill
- Reported: Usually recommendations for law reform but can be advice to government, scoping report or other recommendations
We have published our report on Employment Law Hearing Structures.
All the supporting documents can be found at the bottom of the page.
The Civil Courts Structure Review led by Briggs LJ noted that there is an “awkward area” of shared and exclusive jurisdiction in the fields of discrimination and employment law, which has generated anomalies and boundary issues between the courts and employment tribunals. As a result, employment tribunals sit “uncomfortably stranded between the Civil Courts and the main Tribunal Service”.
They can cause delay and unnecessary complexity. They can also prevent cases being determined by the judges best equipped to handle them. In some types of proceedings, related claims have to be brought in two different courts.
This project came out of our 13th Programme of Law Reform and started in December 2017. Our consultation paper was published on 26 September 2018. Consultation closed on 31 January 2019.
The objectives of the project are to:
- remove unnecessary anomalies, discrepancies and issues which arise from the demarcation of jurisdictions in the fields of discrimination and employment law;
- increase efficiency by ensuring that employment and discrimination cases are, where possible, determined by the judges who are best equipped to hear them; and
- review overall whether the demarcation of jurisdictions and the restrictions on employment tribunals’ jurisdiction are fit-for-purpose and in the interests of access to justice.
The Ministry of Justice and the Department of Business, Energy, Innovation and Skills (BEIS) are in the process of reforming the Employment Tribunal system as part of the modernisation of the courts and tribunals system. They have indicated that there are no plans to consider radical structural change.
Our report works within the boundaries set out by the Government’s position to make recommendations for addressing the problems by means short of major restructuring.
Our report makes 23 recommendations. These include: increasing time limits for bringing employment tribunal claims; introducing a just and equitable test to extend time; introducing flexible deployment of judges to permit employment judges to hear discrimination claims in the civil courts; creating a specialist list in the High Court; increasing the jurisdiction of employment tribunals to hear claims for damages for breach of contract by employees and counterclaims by employers during the currency of a contract of employment and to hear claims in relation to alleged liability arising after employment has terminated; increasing the financial limits on contractual claims; extension of jurisdiction to hear breach of contract claims from workers as well as employees.
By email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Area of law
Nicholas Paines QC